When refining crude oil—whether from soybeans, palm, or rapeseed—the first step might seem simple: remove gums. But if this de-gumming phase is skipped, rushed, or poorly controlled, it can trigger a domino effect across your entire refining line. In fact, studies show that up to 30% of unnecessary chemical consumption in downstream processes stems from incomplete phospholipid removal.
Phospholipids aren’t just impurities—they’re reactive compounds that interfere with key stages like neutralization, bleaching, and deodorization. For example:
Real Case Example: A mid-sized oil mill in Brazil reported an unexpected spike in bleaching agent use after switching suppliers without adjusting their water-based de-gumming process. Post-audit revealed phospholipid levels had risen from 120 ppm to 450 ppm—causing over $25K/month in avoidable chemical waste.
| Method | Efficiency (Phospholipid Removal) | Operational Complexity | Maintenance Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water Hydration | 75–85% | Low | Moderate (scale buildup) |
| Acid Treatment | 85–95% | High | High (corrosion risk) |
| Enzymatic | 90–98% | Medium | Low |
While enzymatic methods offer superior performance, many mills still rely on traditional hydration due to familiarity—and sometimes lack of automation. That’s where smart control systems come in: real-time pH monitoring, temperature gradients, and automated dosing reduce human error by up to 60%, according to industry data from the International Oilseed Processing Association.
Don’t let poor de-gumming sabotage your margins. Whether you're optimizing an existing line or building a new one, precision matters—from lab testing to production scale.
If you’re serious about consistent quality, lower operating costs, and fewer surprises in your refinery, consider how modern solutions can turn your de-gumming stage into a competitive advantage—not a bottleneck.
Choose Penguin Group Equipment — Let Every Step Be Stable, Reliable, and Efficient
